Opposite of MERITOCRACY – 35 Antonyms With Sentence Examples

When exploring antonyms for meritocracy, it is essential to understand the concept of meritocracy itself. Meritocracy is a system where individuals are rewarded and advanced based on their abilities, efforts, and achievements. In a meritocratic society, success is attained through hard work and talent rather than factors like privilege or nepotism.

On the opposite end of the spectrum lie the antonyms for meritocracy, which embody systems or values that do not prioritize merit as the main criteria for advancement. These antonyms may include concepts such as nepotism, aristocracy, favoritism, or cronyism, where factors like family connections, social class, or personal relationships play a significant role in determining one’s success or advancement.

Exploring the antonyms for meritocracy sheds light on alternative ways in which societies or organizations can operate, highlighting the potential drawbacks or flaws in a purely merit-based system. By examining these contrasting concepts, we can gain a deeper understanding of the challenges and complexities inherent in creating fair and equitable systems of opportunity and advancement.

35 Antonyms for MERITOCRACY With Sentences

Here’s a complete list of opposite for meritocracy. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding MERITOCRACY antonyms.

Antonym Sentence with Meritocracy Sentence with Antonym
Nepotism Meritocracy ensures that individuals are promoted based on their performance and abilities. Nepotism often leads to unqualified individuals getting jobs based on their family connections.
Cronyism In a meritocracy, opportunities are given based on one’s skills and qualifications. Cronyism thrives when people are hired or promoted due to personal relationships rather than merit.
Favoritism The concept of meritocracy values fairness and rewards individuals based on their achievements. Favoritism involves showing preference to particular individuals regardless of their accomplishments.
Inequality A society that believes in meritocracy strives to create equal opportunities for everyone based on their abilities. Inequality arises when people are treated unfairly and discriminated against regardless of their skills.
Partiality A true meritocracy judges individuals by their hard work and capabilities, without any bias. Partiality occurs when individuals are treated unfairly based on favoritism rather than their skills.
Discrimination Meritocracy aims to eliminate biases and judge individuals solely based on their talents and accomplishments. Discrimination occurs when people are treated unfairly and unequally due to factors like race or gender.
Prejudice The idea of meritocracy is to promote individuals only based on their abilities and achievements. Prejudice can prevent qualified individuals from succeeding due to unfair judgment against them.
Subjectivity Meritocracy believes in objective evaluation and promotion of individuals based on their skills and performance. Subjectivity comes into play when personal opinions and biases influence decisions instead of objective criteria.
Unfairness A system built on meritocracy ensures that everyone has equal chances to succeed based on their efforts. Unfairness occurs when individuals are treated in a biased or unjust manner, regardless of their merits.
Exclusivity Meritocracy welcomes individuals from diverse backgrounds and provides opportunities based on their abilities. Exclusivity limits access to opportunities, often favoring a select group of people over others.
Mediocrity Meritocracy encourages excellence and rewards individuals who perform exceptionally in their endeavors. Mediocrity thrives in environments that prioritize average performance over outstanding achievement.
Inequity Meritocracy seeks to establish fairness by rewarding individuals based on their hard work and talent. Inequity results from an unfair distribution of resources or opportunities among individuals.
Favouritism Meritocracy rewards individuals purely based on their merits and qualifications, without any bias. Favouritism occurs when individuals receive preferential treatment over others regardless of their abilities.
Classism In a society that values meritocracy, individuals are judged and rewarded based on their skills and contributions. Classism allows discrimination based on social class, hindering individuals’ opportunities regardless of their capabilities.
Eliteism Meritocracy believes in providing equal opportunities to individuals based on their talents and hard work. Eliteism perpetuates the belief that a select group of individuals are superior and more deserving than others without merit.
Impartiality Meritocracy ensures impartial judgment and promotion of individuals based solely on their qualifications. Partiality leads to biased decisions where individuals are treated unfairly based on personal relationships rather than merit.
Insufficiency A system based on meritocracy ensures that individuals are selected for opportunities based on their qualifications and achievements. Insufficiency arises when individuals are overlooked or denied opportunities despite having the necessary skills.
Unjustness Meritocracy seeks to eliminate unfairness by evaluating individuals based on their abilities and performance. Unjustness stems from treating individuals in a biased and unjust manner, disregarding their merits.
Entitlement Meritocracy promotes the idea that individuals should earn their positions through hard work and determination. Entitlement suggests that individuals deserve certain privileges or advantages without having to demonstrate merit.
Preselection In a system of meritocracy, individuals are chosen for opportunities based on their qualifications and competence. Preselection occurs when individuals are picked for roles or rewards based on factors unrelated to merit or ability.
Partiality Meritocracy is founded on the principles of fairness and rewarding individuals based on their achievements. Partiality involves showing bias towards certain individuals, irrespective of their qualifications.
Elitism Meritocracy emphasizes equal opportunities for all individuals to succeed based on their skills and hard work. Elitism propagates the belief that a select few are superior and entitled to privileges regardless of merit.
Privilege In a society that practices meritocracy, individuals are granted opportunities based on their abilities and achievements. Privilege allows certain individuals to enjoy advantages without merit, disadvantaging others.
Unfairness A true meritocracy ensures that individuals are chosen for opportunities based on their merit and capabilities. Unfairness arises when individuals are treated unequally or unjustly, regardless of their merit.
Paternalism Meritocracy operates on the principles of rewarding individuals based on their skills and hard work. Paternalism involves the practice of treating individuals as inferiors who need protection or guidance, not based on merit.
Particularism Meritocracy values fairness and offers opportunities to individuals based on their achievements and qualifications. Particularism discriminates by favoring specific individuals unfairly, regardless of their abilities.
Injustice A system of meritocracy promotes fairness by evaluating individuals based on their merits and achievements. Injustice occurs when individuals are treated unfairly, oftentimes due to biases or prejudices rather than merit.
Disparity Meritocracy strives to eliminate disparities by ensuring that individuals are rewarded based on their abilities. Disparity emerges when there are significant differences or inequalities in treatment regardless of merit.
Partiality In a meritocracy, individuals are evaluated and selected for opportunities solely based on their skills and performance. Partiality occurs when individuals are treated with bias or favoritism, overlooking their qualifications.
READ:  Opposite of DERIVE - 35 Antonyms With Sentence Examples

Final Thoughts about Antonyms of MERITOCRACY

In a society that values privilege over fairness, the concept of meritocracy is undermined. Instead of rewarding hard work and talent, nepotism and favoritism dictate success. As opportunities become skewed towards those with connections rather than competence, equality and justice are compromised.

When the playing field is not level and success is not based on merit, society loses out on the potential contributions of individuals who are truly deserving. It is crucial to strive for a system that is built on meritocracy, where individuals are judged on their abilities and efforts rather than their social status. Only then can we create a fair and just society where everyone has the opportunity to succeed based on their merit.

Leave a Comment