Antonyms for quorum are terms that describe situations where the minimum number of members required for a decision-making body to conduct official business is not met. Quorums are typically set to ensure that decisions are made by a representative enough group and that minority opinions are considered. Any meeting or assembly that falls short of reaching the required quorum may not be able to make valid decisions or votes.
Not reaching a quorum can result in a meeting being postponed or canceled, as decisions made without the required number of participants may lack legitimacy. Antonyms for quorum indicate when meetings or gatherings are not able to proceed due to insufficient attendance. In such cases, alternative measures may need to be taken to convene a valid session or to reschedule the meeting for a later time when the required quorum can be achieved.
35 Antonyms for QUORUM With Sentences
Here’s a complete list of opposite for quorum. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding QUORUM antonyms.
| Antonym | Sentence with Quorum | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Majority | The quorum was not reached, so the meeting was canceled. | The majority was present, so the meeting proceeded. |
| Few | Only a handful of members showed up, not enough for quorum. | There were few members missing, but enough for the meeting. |
| Scarcity | The scarcity of attendees led to a failed quorum. | The abundance of participants ensured a full quorum. |
| Deficiency | A deficiency in numbers prevented the attainment of quorum. | The excess of participants easily met the quorum requirement. |
| Scant | Attendance remained scant, falling short of quorum. | A surplus of members ensured that quorum was met. |
| Meager | The meager turnout did not meet the required quorum. | An ample showing secured the necessary quorum. |
| Insufficiency | The insufficiency of participants resulted in a failed quorum. | The adequacy of attendees ensured a successful quorum. |
| Rarity | The rarity of members present did not constitute a quorum. | The commonality of attendees easily reached quorum. |
| Sparse | The sparse attendance fell short of achieving quorum. | The abundance of participants surpassed the quorum threshold. |
| Paucity | The paucity of individuals present failed to meet quorum. | The plenty of attendees guaranteed a successful quorum. |
| Paltry | The paltry number of members did not meet the required quorum. | A substantial turnout ensured that quorum was achieved. |
| Limited | The limited number of attendees did not reach quorum. | The plentiful participation easily surpassed the quorum. |
| Deficit | The deficit of participants prevented the formation of quorum. | The surplus of members ensured that the necessary quorum was reached. |
| Infrequent | The infrequent attendance failed to achieve quorum. | The frequent presence of participants easily reached the quorum threshold. |
| Scarceness | The scarceness of members present did not constitute a quorum. | The abundance of attendees ensured the meeting reached quorum. |
| Inadequacy | An inadequacy in numbers prevented the attainment of quorum. | The sufficiency of participants met the quorum requirement. |
| Fewness | The fewness of members present made it impossible to reach quorum. | The plentitude of attendees easily met the quorum requirement. |
| Insufficiency | The insufficiency of participants resulted in a failed quorum. | The sufficiency of attendees ensured a successful quorum. |
| Shortage | The shortage of attendees prevented the establishment of quorum. | An abundance of members ensured a full quorum. |
| Dearth | The dearth of members present was insufficient to achieve quorum. | An excess of participants made sure quorum was met. |
| Inadequateness | The inadequateness of members attending led to failed quorum. | The profusion of participants secured the necessary quorum. |
| Sparsity | The sparsity of attendees did not reach the required quorum. | The profusion of participants exceeded the quorum threshold. |
| Minimum | The attendance was below the minimum required for quorum. | The participants exceeded the minimum number needed for quorum. |
| Scarcity | The scarcity of members present prevented the achievement of quorum. | An abundance of participants established the necessary quorum. |
| Deficiency | A deficiency in numbers resulted in the failure to reach quorum. | The presence of an adequacy of members ensured a successful quorum. |
| Rarity | The rarity of attendees did not meet the minimum quorum. | The commonality of participants ensured the attainment of quorum. |
| Deficit | The deficit in attendees hindered the establishment of quorum. | An excess of participants easily surpassed the quorum requirement. |
| Infrequency | The infrequency of members present did not constitute quorum. | The frequency of attendees ensured the meeting reached the quorum. |
| Scarceness | The scarceness of participants made it impossible to form quorum. | The abundance of attendees ensured the establishment of quorum. |
Final Thoughts about Antonyms of QUORUM
In conclusion, while a full assembly may be preferable for decision-making, a lack of quorum can also pose challenges in reaching consensus and taking action. Antonyms for quorum such as few, minority, and scattering highlight the potential drawbacks of insufficient participation in group discussions or voting processes. Without a sufficient number of members present, progress can be stalled, diverse perspectives may be underrepresented, and the group’s effectiveness in making collective decisions can be compromised. Therefore, ensuring a quorum is essential for democratic processes and productive outcomes in organizational settings. In contrast, the absence of a quorum can impede the efficiency and validity of group decisions, underscoring the importance of active participation and engagement to achieve meaningful results.
