Antonyms for sovereignty refer to concepts that contrast with the idea of having supreme power or authority. These terms signify a lack of independence, autonomy, or control over one’s own affairs. Opposing the notion of sovereignty, antonyms in this context highlight limitations or dependencies on external factors or entities.
When discussing antonyms for sovereignty, we explore terms that represent subjugation, submission, or being subject to the control or dominance of others. These opposites imply a state of being under someone else’s rule, direction, or influence, rather than having the freedom and power to make decisions independently. By examining these antonyms, we gain insight into the various ways in which authority and power dynamics can manifest.
In contrast to sovereignty, antonyms reveal vulnerabilities, restrictions, and the absence of absolute authority. Understanding these oppositional terms broadens our perspective on governance, rights, and the complexities of power relations in different contexts. By delving into antonyms for sovereignty, we uncover the nuances of control, autonomy, and the diverse forms of authority that exist in society.
35 Antonyms for SOVEREIGNTY With Sentences
Here’s a complete list of opposite for sovereignty. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding SOVEREIGNTY antonyms.
|Sentence with Sovereignty
|Sentence with Antonym
|The sovereignty of the nation was unquestionable.
|The country’s dependency on foreign aid was evident.
|The king ruled with absolute sovereignty over his realm.
|The subjects lived in constant subservience to the tyrannical ruler.
|The president exercises sovereignty over the country’s affairs.
|The state’s lack of subordination to the central government led to chaos.
|The queen’s sovereignty extended over the entire kingdom.
|The peasants were bound in a state of servitude to their masters.
|The government exercises sovereignty over its citizens.
|The rebels refused to show obedience to the ruling authorities.
|The sovereignty of the empire was unchallenged.
|The conquered lands were forced into a state of inferiority compared to the conquerors.
|The monarch’s sovereignty over the land was absolute.
|The nation’s weakness was evident in its inability to defend itself.
|The sovereignty of the state was crucial in times of crisis.
|Without proper defenses, the city was left in a state of vulnerability.
|The king’s sovereignty was acknowledged by all.
|The ruler’s impotence in the face of rebellion led to chaos.
|The queen’s sovereignty extended to every corner of the kingdom.
|The people felt a sense of helplessness under the oppressive regime.
|The sovereignty of the ruler extended over all his subjects.
|The conquered people lived in a constant state of subjugation.
|The leader’s sovereignty was demonstrated through his every command.
|His regime was marked by tyranny and dictatorship.
|The nation fought for its independence and sovereignty.
|The enslaved people yearned to break free from the chains of slavery.
|The king’s sovereignty allowed him to enforce his will on the kingdom.
|The use of coercion by the ruler led to fear and resentment among the people.
|The ruler’s sovereignty was unquestionable.
|The state’s frailty was exposed when faced with external threats.
|The empire’s sovereignty was tested during times of war.
|Fragility of the regime was revealed by internal conflicts.
|The queen’s sovereignty extended to the outer realms.
|The colony’s dependence on the motherland was undeniable.
|The leader held the sovereignty over his people.
|The people’s submission to the ruler was born out of fear.
|The king’s sovereignty was maintained through strict rule.
|The rebellion was met with suppression by the ruling authorities.
|The monarch exercised sovereignty over the entire kingdom.
|The peasants had no ownership of the lands they worked on.
|The ruler’s sovereignty was upheld through the loyalty of his subjects.
|The people suffered under the weight of oppression.
|The queen’s sovereignty was unquestioned in the realm.
|The ruler’s tyranny over the populace led to unrest.
|The emperor’s sovereignty extended over vast territories.
|The conquered lands were forced into a state of subjection.
|The country fought for its sovereignty and independence.
|The territory was reluctantly ceded to the conquering nation.
|The king’s sovereignty over his lands was absolute.
|The lack of a central authority led to anarchy.
|The nation’s sovereignty was challenged by external threats.
|The state’s military was weak and unable to defend itself.
|The ruler’s sovereignty was a source of pride for the kingdom.
|The state’s stability was in jeopardy due to internal strife.
|The king’s sovereignty was acknowledged by his subjects.
|The general’s insubordinate actions threatened the stability of the army.
|The president’s sovereignty over the nation’s affairs was undisputed.
|The nation was dependent on foreign aid for its economic stability.
|The queen’s sovereignty extended over every aspect of the realm.
|The citizens felt helpless under the oppressive regime.
Final Thoughts about Antonyms of SOVEREIGNTY
In essence, sovereignty denotes the power and authority a governing body possesses to make decisions and enforce laws within its jurisdiction. However, when sovereignty is lacking, a nation may find itself facing challenges such as limited autonomy, authority, or independence. In such scenarios, the entity may struggle to exercise control over its territory or make decisions without external interference.
The antonyms of sovereignty reveal the significance of having a strong and unchallenged authority over a region for effective governance. When sovereignty is compromised, a nation’s ability to uphold its laws, protect its citizens, and assert its independence may be jeopardized. Thus, the concept of sovereignty is crucial for a state to maintain stability, security, and self-determination.